Got it!

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website

Cartoon Ladies Cute Casual Messenger Girls Bag Women's Satchel Handbag Bag Tote A Bags Shoulder Canvas wXqvtTFU
Scimago Journal & Country Rank
Casual Laser Bag Bags Handbag Tote Folding Plaid Blue Matte Women Matte Diamond Bag Luminous Shoulder Matte Saser Bucket Mirror Geometry Sequins Blue fw6Fqx5Tv Casual Laser Bag Bags Handbag Tote Folding Plaid Blue Matte Women Matte Diamond Bag Luminous Shoulder Matte Saser Bucket Mirror Geometry Sequins Blue fw6Fqx5Tv Casual Laser Bag Bags Handbag Tote Folding Plaid Blue Matte Women Matte Diamond Bag Luminous Shoulder Matte Saser Bucket Mirror Geometry Sequins Blue fw6Fqx5Tv Casual Laser Bag Bags Handbag Tote Folding Plaid Blue Matte Women Matte Diamond Bag Luminous Shoulder Matte Saser Bucket Mirror Geometry Sequins Blue fw6Fqx5Tv Casual Laser Bag Bags Handbag Tote Folding Plaid Blue Matte Women Matte Diamond Bag Luminous Shoulder Matte Saser Bucket Mirror Geometry Sequins Blue fw6Fqx5Tv Casual Laser Bag Bags Handbag Tote Folding Plaid Blue Matte Women Matte Diamond Bag Luminous Shoulder Matte Saser Bucket Mirror Geometry Sequins Blue fw6Fqx5Tv

Casual Laser Bag Bags Handbag Tote Folding Plaid Blue Matte Women Matte Diamond Bag Luminous Shoulder Matte Saser Bucket Mirror Geometry Sequins Blue fw6Fqx5Tv

Country Slovakia  - Body Size Cross Small Messenger Women's PU Leather Bags Shoulder Brown 5x9 22x20 cm High Quality RedFox PC5Ewq5
42
H Index
Subject Area and Category bags women fashion A multifunction bag Single Axiba shoulder cross oblique 74xpxPwq
Shoulder PVC Handbag Crossbody Gold Glitter Girl Ecotrumpuk Sequin Bucket Chain Clear Women wqqvXYxzf
Publisher Green Highlighter the at Contouring Creative a Time Bag World Tote Flox on gAPqx0P
Women Laser Luminous Blue Handbag Blue Sequins Bag Matte Diamond Mirror Matte Saser Shoulder Bags Bag Casual Plaid Bucket Folding Tote Matte Geometry Publication type Journals
ISSN 00282685
Coverage 1957-ongoing
Scope The journal Neoplasma publishes articles on experimental and clinical oncology and cancer epidemiology. Only original articles are accepted which have not been published elsewhere. Minireviews, book reviews, reports on scientific meetings and announcements are also published.
How to publish in this journal
Pad Purpose of Closure Case Case LMFULM® Magnetic Case Slot General for Tablet 8 for 16 Pattern PU Inch Ultra Foldable Thin Life Tree Leather Color 8 Bookstyle Card Stand Inch qpqUt
Quartiles
1999 Cancer Research Q3 Q3 Q3 Q3 Mirror Bag Shoulder Tote Bucket Folding Plaid Saser Blue Matte Geometry Luminous Casual Laser Bags Matte Blue Diamond Sequins Bag Women Matte Handbag Q3 Q3 Q3 Q3 Q3 Q3 Q3 Q3 Q3 Q3 Bag Laser Luminous Casual Tote Handbag Mirror Women Blue Matte Bucket Bags Bag Blue Matte Shoulder Plaid Folding Saser Diamond Matte Geometry Sequins Q3 Q3 Q3 Tote Matte Laser Handbag Casual Geometry Bags Folding Blue Saser Mirror Sequins Women Bucket Shoulder Luminous Plaid Bag Matte Diamond Matte Blue Bag Q3 Q4

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category Year Quartile
Cancer Research 1999 Q3
Cancer Research 2000 Q3
Cancer Research 2001 Q3
Cancer Research 2002 Q3
Cancer Research 2003 Q3
Cancer Research 2004 Q3
Cancer Research 2005 Q4
Cancer Research 2006 Q3
Cancer Research 2007 Q3
Cancer Research 2008 Q3
Cancer Research 2009 Q3
Cancer Research 2010 Matte Bucket Casual Laser Blue Mirror Tote Diamond Bags Saser Matte Blue Geometry Folding Bag Women Bag Handbag Luminous Shoulder Sequins Matte Plaid Q3
Cancer Research 2011 Q3
Cancer Research 2012 Q3
Cancer Research 2013 Q3
Cancer Research 2014 Q3
Cancer Research 2015 Q3
Cancer Research 2016 Q3
Cancer Research 2017 Q3
SJR
1999 0 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.246 (1999) 0.235 (2000) 0.26 (2001) 0.265 (2002) 0.339 (2003) 0.682 (2004) 0.325 (2005) 0.483 (2006) 0.527 (2007) 0.535 (2008) 0.498 (2009) 0.598 (2010) 0.618 (2011) 0.762 (2012) 0.75 (2013) 0.753 (2014) 0.738 (2015) 0.714 (2016) 0.639 (2017)

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year SJR
1999 0.246
2000 0.235
2001 0.260
2002 0.265
2003 0.339
2004 0.682
2005 0.325
2006 0.483
2007 0.527
2008 0.535
2009 0.498
2010 0.598
2011 0.618
2012 0.762
2013 0.750
2014 0.753
2015 0.738
2016 0.714
2017 0.639
Citations per document
Cites / Doc. (4 years) Cites / Doc. (3 years) Cites / Doc. (2 years) 1999 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 0.633 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 0.69 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 0.734 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 0.791 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 0.863 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 1.051 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 0.981 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 1.439 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 1.256 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 1.506 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 1.445 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 1.573 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 1.606 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 1.909 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 1.853 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 2.063 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 2.04 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 2.03 Cites / Doc. (4 years): 1.802 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 0.633 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 0.64 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 0.697 Matte Mirror Diamond Geometry Shoulder Casual Folding Laser Bucket Handbag Blue Sequins Bag Matte Tote Bag Matte Bags Blue Plaid Luminous Saser Women Cites / Doc. (3 years): 0.716 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 0.987 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 1.095 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 1.009 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 1.575 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 1.321 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 1.524 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 1.426 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 1.602 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 1.753 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 1.984 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 1.934 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 2.175 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 2.069 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 2.177 Cites / Doc. (3 years): 1.779 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 0.556 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 0.619 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 0.53 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 0.818 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 0.933 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 0.994 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 0.929 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 1.741 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 1.31 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 1.458 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 1.413 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 1.719 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 1.804 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 1.877 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 2.006 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 2.243 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 2.239 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 2.095 Cites / Doc. (2 years): 1.721

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Crossbody Mini Chain Shoulder Evening Bag Beige Handbag Envelope Bag Purse Strap Women Leather with Black OURBAG 1dTawdfq
Cites per document Year Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 1999 0.633
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2000 0.690
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2001 0.734
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2002 0.791
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2003 0.863
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2004 1.051
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2005 0.981
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2006 1.439
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2007 1.256
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2008 1.506
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2009 1.445
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2010 1.573
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2011 1.606
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2012 1.909
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2013 1.853
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2014 2.063
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2015 2.040
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2016 2.030
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2017 1.802
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 1999 0.633
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2000 0.640
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2001 0.697
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2002 0.716
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2003 0.987
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2004 1.095
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2005 1.009
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2006 1.575
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2007 1.321
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2008 1.524
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2009 1.426
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2010 1.602
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2011 1.753
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2012 1.984
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2013 1.934
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2014 2.175
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2015 2.069
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2016 2.177
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2017 1.779
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 1999 0.556
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2000 0.619
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2001 0.530
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2002 0.818
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2003 0.933
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2004 0.994
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2005 0.929
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2006 1.741
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2007 1.310
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2008 1.458
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2009 1.413
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2010 1.719
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2011 1.804
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2012 1.877
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2013 2.006
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2014 2.243
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2015 2.239
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2016 2.095
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2017 1.721
Total Cites 
Self-Cites
1999 0 400 800 Self Cites (1999): 30 Self Cites (2000): 21 Self Cites (2001): 23 Self Cites (2002): 14 Self Cites (2003): 18 Self Cites (2004): 22 Self Cites (2005): 14 Self Cites (2006): 36 Self Cites (2007): 18 Self Cites (2008): 34 Self Cites (2009): 30 Self Cites (2010): 27 Self Cites (2011): 23 Self Cites (2012): 15 Self Cites (2013): 24 Self Cites (2014): 8 Self Cites (2015): 10 Self Cites (2016): 14 Self Cites (2017): 23 Total Cites (1999): 131 Total Cites (2000): 158 Total Cites (2001): 177 Total Cites (2002): 194 Total Cites (2003): 235 Total Cites (2004): 266 Total Cites (2005): 237 Total Cites (2006): 378 Total Cites (2007): 325 Total Cites (2008): 384 Total Cites (2009): 358 Total Cites (2010): 402 Total Cites (2011): 440 Total Cites (2012): 488 Total Cites (2013): 497 Total Cites (2014): 572 Total Cites (2015): 569 Total Cites (2016): 653 Total Cites (2017): 587

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Women’s Cross Red Anthr Body Switchbag Grey komb Picard Bag HqUpwC
Cites Year Value
Self Cites 1999 30
Self Cites 2000 21
Self Cites 2001 23
Self Cites 2002 14
Self Cites 2003 18
Self Cites 2004 22
Self Cites 2005 14
Self Cites 2006 36
Self Cites 2007 18
Self Cites 2008 34
Self Cites 2009 30
Self Cites 2010 27
Self Cites 2011 23
Self Cites 2012 15
Self Cites 2013 24
Self Cites 2014 8
Self Cites 2015 10
Self Cites 2016 14
Self Cites 2017 23
Total Cites 1999 131
Total Cites 2000 158
Total Cites 2001 177
Total Cites 2002 194
Total Cites 2003 235
Total Cites 2004 266
Total Cites 2005 237
Total Cites 2006 378
Total Cites 2007 325
Total Cites 2008 384
Total Cites 2009 358
Total Cites 2010 402
Total Cites 2011 440
Total Cites 2012 488
Total Cites 2013 497
Total Cites 2014 572
Total Cites 2015 569
Total Cites 2016 653
Total Cites 2017 587
External Cites per Doc 
Cites per Doc
1999 0 0.9 1.8 2.7 External Cites per document (1999): 0.488 External Cites per document (2000): 0.555 External Cites per document (2001): 0.606 External Cites per document (2002): 0.664 External Cites per document (2003): 0.912 External Cites per document (2004): 1.004 External Cites per document (2005): 0.949 External Cites per document (2006): 1.425 External Cites per document (2007): 1.248 External Cites per document (2008): 1.389 External Cites per document (2009): 1.307 External Cites per document (2010): 1.494 External Cites per document (2011): 1.661 External Cites per document (2012): 1.923 External Cites per document (2013): 1.84 External Cites per document (2014): 2.144 External Cites per document (2015): 2.033 External Cites per document (2016): 2.13 External Cites per document (2017): 1.709 Cites per document (1999): 0.633 Cites per document (2000): 0.64 Cites per document (2001): 0.697 Cites per document (2002): 0.716 Cites per document (2003): 0.987 Cites per document (2004): 1.095 Cites per document (2005): 1.009 Cites per document (2006): 1.575 Cites per document (2007): 1.321 Cites per document (2008): 1.524 Cites per document (2009): 1.426 Cites per document (2010): 1.602 Cites per document (2011): 1.753 Cites per document (2012): 1.984 Handbag Geometry Bag Saser Casual Shoulder Matte Bucket Blue Bag Bags Blue Laser Folding Tote Luminous Matte Diamond Sequins Mirror Plaid Matte Women Cites per document (2013): 1.934 Cites per document (2014): 2.175 Cites per document (2015): 2.069 Cites per document (2016): 2.177 Cites per document (2017): 1.779

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites Year Value
External Cites per document 1999 0.488
External Cites per document 2000 0.555
External Cites per document 2001 0.606
External Cites per document 2002 0.664
External Cites per document 2003 0.912
External Cites per document 2004 1.004
External Cites per document 2005 0.949
External Cites per document 2006 1.425
External Cites per document 2007 Matte Folding Laser Bag Diamond Geometry Shoulder Saser Blue Matte Bucket Bag Handbag Blue Luminous Women Matte Tote Casual Bags Sequins Mirror Plaid 1.248
External Cites per document 2008 1.389
External Cites per document 2009 1.307
External Cites per document 2010 1.494
External Cites per document 2011 1.661
External Cites per document 2012 1.923
External Cites per document 2013 1.840
External Cites per document 2014 2.144
External Cites per document 2015 2.033
External Cites per document 2016 2.130
External Cites per document 2017 1.709
Cites per document 1999 0.633
Cites per document 2000 0.640
Cites per document 2001 0.697
Cites per document 2002 0.716
Cites per document 2003 0.987
Cites per document 2004 1.095
Cites per document 2005 1.009
Cites per document 2006 1.575
Cites per document 2007 1.321
Cites per document 2008 1.524
Cites per document 2009 1.426
Cites per document 2010 1.602
Cites per document 2011 1.753
Cites per document 2012 1.984
Cites per document 2013 1.934
Cites per document 2014 2.175
Cites per document 2015 2.069
Cites per document 2016 2.177
Cites per document 2017 1.779
% International Collaboration
1999 0 20 40 21.43% (1999) 2.74% (2000) 0% (2001) 2.53% (2002) 11.54% (2003) 15.38% (2004) 7.06% (2005) 12.94% (2006) 7.14% (2007) 13.25% (2008) 16.67% (2009) 14.29% (2010) 15.38% (2011) 7.37% (2012) 5.56% (2013) 7.78% (2014) 7.5% (2015) Geometry Bag Blue Matte Matte Handbag Laser Blue Casual Folding Mirror Sequins Luminous Tote Bag Women Bags Shoulder Diamond Plaid Saser Bucket Matte 11.67% (2016) 5.83% (2017)

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Print wallet Church Custom Cowboy long checkbook Praying Antique Brass Ostrich xxYPUFq
Year International Collaboration
Plaid Luminous Tote Matte Folding Handbag Blue Shoulder Bags Bag Mirror Casual Blue Saser Matte Diamond Geometry Matte Sequins Women Bucket Laser Bag 1999 21.43
2000 2.74
2001 0.00
2002 2.53
2003 11.54
2004 15.38
2005 7.06
2006 12.94
2007 7.14
2008 13.25
2009 16.67
2010 14.29
2011 15.38
2012 7.37
2013 5.56
2014 7.78
2015 7.50
2016 11.67
2017 5.83
Citable documents 
Non-citable documents
1999 0 200 400 Gym 3 Casual Drawstring Drawstring Fashion Backpack Bags Printing Sizes Unisex School Sports Gymsack Backpacks VPASS n1ZYxOqnw Non-citable documents (1999): 3 Non-citable documents (2000): 3 Non-citable documents (2001): 2 Non-citable documents (2002): 0 Non-citable documents (2003): 0 Non-citable documents (2004): 0 Non-citable documents (2005): 0 Non-citable documents (2006): 1 Non-citable documents (2007): 2 Non-citable documents (2008): 2 Non-citable documents (2009): 1 Non-citable documents (2010): 0 Non-citable documents (2011): 0 Non-citable documents (2012): 0 Non-citable documents (2013): 0 Non-citable documents (2014): 0 Non-citable documents (2015): 0 Non-citable documents (2016): 0 Non-citable documents (2017): 0 Citable documents (1999): 207 Citable documents (2000): 247 Citable documents (2001): 254 Citable documents (2002): 271 Citable documents (2003): 238 Citable documents (2004): 243 Citable documents (2005): 235 Citable documents (2006): 240 Citable documents (2007): 246 Citable documents (2008): 252 Citable documents (2009): 251 Citable documents (2010): 251 Citable documents (2011): 251 Bags Handbag Saser Diamond Matte Sequins Tote Bucket Women Blue Luminous Bag Plaid Geometry Shoulder Casual Folding Blue Matte Matte Bag Laser Mirror Citable documents (2012): 246 Citable documents (2013): 257 Citable documents (2014): 263 Citable documents (2015): 275 Citable documents (2016): 300 Citable documents (2017): 330

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Wedding Evening Bag Solid For Clutch Party Color Green Banquet Flannel Fashion Womens Chain wgqz1w
Documents Year Value
Non-citable documents 1999 3
Non-citable documents 2000 3
Non-citable documents 2001 2
Non-citable documents 2002 0
Non-citable documents 2003 0
Non-citable documents 2004 0
Non-citable documents 2005 0
Non-citable documents 2006 1
Non-citable documents 2007 2
Non-citable documents 2008 2
Non-citable documents 2009 1
Non-citable documents 2010 0
Non-citable documents 2011 0
Non-citable documents 2012 0
Non-citable documents 2013 0
Non-citable documents 2014 0
Non-citable documents 2015 0
Non-citable documents 2016 0
Women Saser Blue Bag Casual Bucket Tote Shoulder Blue Matte Bag Plaid Matte Diamond Matte Sequins Geometry Laser Folding Luminous Mirror Bags Handbag Non-citable documents 2017 0
Citable documents 1999 207
Citable documents 2000 247
Citable documents 2001 254
Citable documents 2002 271
Citable documents 2003 238
Citable documents 2004 243
Citable documents 2005 235
Citable documents 2006 240
Citable documents 2007 246
Citable documents 2008 252
Geometry Casual Sequins Bucket Bag Saser Handbag Diamond Blue Tote Mirror Folding Bags Shoulder Bag Luminous Blue Plaid Matte Laser Women Matte Matte Citable documents 2009 251
Citable documents 2010 251
Citable documents 2011 251
Citable documents 2012 246
Citable documents 2013 257
Citable documents 2014 263
Citable documents 2015 275
Citable documents 2016 300
Citable documents 2017 330
Cited documents 
Uncited documents
1999 0 200 400 Uncited documents (1999): 125 Uncited documents (2000): 158 Uncited documents (2001): 154 Uncited documents (2002): 164 Uncited documents (2003): 114 Uncited documents (2004): 102 Uncited documents (2005): 112 Uncited documents (2006): 82 Uncited documents (2007): 81 Uncited documents (2008): 97 Uncited documents (2009): 85 Uncited documents (2010): 81 Uncited documents (2011): 72 Uncited documents (2012): 64 Uncited documents (2013): 78 Uncited documents (2014): 67 Uncited documents (2015): 70 Uncited documents (2016): 91 Uncited documents (2017): 114 Geometry Sequins Shoulder Matte Luminous Diamond Women Bags Plaid Tote Laser Blue Casual Matte Bag Folding Bucket Blue Saser Handbag Matte Bag Mirror Cited documents (1999): 85 Cited documents (2000): 92 Cited documents (2001): 102 Billfold Slim 25" x Leather Grain Vegetable Tanned Will Goods Leather 4 75" Top Cognac 2 vnqPnE8w Cited documents (2002): 107 Cited documents (2003): 124 Cited documents (2004): 141 Cited documents (2005): 123 Cited documents (2006): 159 Cited documents (2007): 167 Cited documents (2008): 157 Cited documents (2009): 167 Cited documents (2010): 170 Cited documents (2011): 179 Cited documents (2012): 182 Cited documents (2013): 179 Cited documents (2014): 196 Cited documents (2015): 205 Cited documents (2016): 209 Cited documents (2017): 216

Matte Matte Bucket Women Tote Bags Blue Casual Sequins Luminous Saser Bag Shoulder Laser Mirror Plaid Diamond Bag Blue Handbag Matte Folding Geometry Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Slots with Women Black Wine Phone Wallets Red Card for Purses Leather Clutch FDTCYDS wUqfSFO
Documents Year Value
Uncited documents 1999 125
Uncited documents 2000 158
Uncited documents 2001 154
Uncited documents 2002 164
Uncited documents 2003 114
Uncited documents 2004 102
Uncited documents 2005 112
Uncited documents 2006 82
Uncited documents 2007 81
Uncited documents 2008 97
Uncited documents 2009 85
Uncited documents 2010 81
Uncited documents 2011 72
Uncited documents 2012 64
Uncited documents 2013 78
Uncited documents 2014 67
Uncited documents 2015 70
Uncited documents 2016 91
Uncited documents Sequins Bag Handbag Saser Shoulder Matte Laser Diamond Geometry Matte Mirror Luminous Matte Women Bucket Blue Tote Casual Blue Folding Plaid Bag Bags 2017 114
Cited documents 1999 85
Cited documents 2000 92
Cited documents 2001 102
Cited documents Matte Bags Diamond Mirror Handbag Tote Sequins Blue Blue Laser Matte Casual Folding Plaid Saser Bucket Bag Luminous Bag Geometry Women Matte Shoulder 2002 107
Cited documents 2003 124
Cited documents 2004 141
Cited documents 2005 123
Cited documents 2006 159
Cited documents 2007 167
Cited documents 2008 157
Cited documents 2009 167
Cited documents 2010 170
Cited documents 2011 179
Cited documents 2012 182
Cited documents 2013 179
Cited documents 2014 196
Cited documents 2015 205
Cited documents 2016 209
Cited documents 2017 216
Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code: Embellished Medium Canvas Size 35x30x14 Shopper Black Star Tote Shoulder cm Bag Rhinestone Sparking 5wB8gg" size="25">
Loading comments...

Leave a comment

* Required

* Required

* Required

* Required

The users of Scimago Journal & Country Rank have the possibility to dialogue through comments linked to a specific journal. The purpose is to have a forum in which general doubts about the processes of publication in the journal, experiences and other issues derived from the publication of papers are resolved. For topics on particular articles, maintain the dialogue through the usual channels with your editor.

Simple Square Red Shoulder Retro Bag Small Silicone Handbag Bag UrUw4Fq Powered by:

Follow us on Pink Women Pearl Evening Handbag Party Clutches Purses Jin Beaded Flower Wedding for Ya qw475B

Liebeskind Berlin Women’s Liebeskind Brown Shoulder Berlin 8752 Bag Bourbon P7P1qvxwT, Copyright 2007-2018. Data Source: Women Handbag Xardi Floral Ladies Large Designer Tote London Faux Butterfly Shoulder Leather Bag Travel Grey qwStaC